The weak diminished and eventually all died, and the strong got more power and continued to grow.
The argument for social Darwinism is similar to the principles of Darwin's theory because it says in the very beginning that the nations are in a struggle for survival, the advanced people will prosper, while the weaker ones will eventually die off.
These theories apply to humans in the sense that we physically undergo changes to cope with our environment.
War is not natural selection, this is something that man has brought on each other, nature has nothing to do with this.
Now just because the civilization with cannons has better technology doesn't mean they are better. Now if they didn't kill each other and were peaceful and mixed the two gene pools they would have a race superior to what one of them where.
This is why Darwin¹s theories apply to nature, not human nature. First of all he states that of the great ideas of mankind is liberty.
Humans are intelligent enough that we do not need to compete against each other for land or food.
Social Darwinism is used to justify a king who wants more land that already has too much, or a bigger throne to sit on.
* * * * * * Social Darwinism in the Business World by Mary Carroll The theory of natural selection does adhere to the principals of Darwin's theory.
Darwin believed that the stronger would live on by adapting to the environment around them while the weaker would just eventually die off.