In most circumstances, this is best accomplished by physically separating statements about new observations from statements about the meaning or significance of those observations.
Alternatively, this goal can be accomplished by careful use of phrases such as "I infer ..." vast bodies of geological literature became obsolete with the advent of plate tectonics; the papers that survived are those in which observations were presented in stand-alone fashion, unmuddied by whatever ideas the author might have had about the processes that caused the observed phenomena.
This person will become your research mentor and this gives you someone to talk with and get background material from.
If you're unsure about the selection of a project, let us know and we'll try to connect you with someone.
This is a statement of something sufficiently interesting to motivate your reader to read the rest of the paper, it is an important/interesting scientific problem that your paper either solves or addresses.
You should draw the reader in and make them want to read the rest of the paper.The next paragraphs in the introduction should cite previous research in this area.It should cite those who had the idea or ideas first, and should also cite those who have done the most recent and relevant work. The list should include a short title for each figure but not the whole caption. The list should include a short title for each table but not the whole caption.You can't write a good introduction until you know what the body of the paper says.The first time you read something, you will consciously remember some things, but may subconsciously take in other aspects.It is important to cross check your conscious memory against your citations. Kennedy, 1985, On Academic Authorship Sigma Xi, 1984, Honor in Science Yale University pamphlet on plagiarism Write for brevity rather than length.Because of the literature explosion, papers more skimmed than read.Skimming involves reading the abstract, and looking at the figures and figure captions.Your approach/methods should be carefully designed to come to closure.Your results should be clearly defined and discussed in the context of your topic. You should place your analysis in a broader context, and highlight the implications (regional, global, etc.) of your work.